ArticleScientific reports2025
Steering strategies for wasp inspired self propelled needles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positioning a thin needle into a solid substrate near a target region is difficult because the needle can easily bend and buckle. Nevertheless, in nature, female parasitic wasps can do this by using buckling prevention and steering mechanisms. This study presents a self-propelled needle that incorporates wasp-inspired steering mechanisms, specifically, the use of pretension and asymmetry within the needle segments. The needle with an outer diameter of 0.89 millimeters comprises seven parallel needle segments, with the central needle segment being either straight for a forward trajectory or prebent for steering purposes. By retracting and rotating the prebent central needle segment, the needle is capable of omnidirectional steering. The performance of the needle in tissue-mimicking phantoms was evaluated in terms of its propulsion efficiency and steering performance. The propulsion efficiency, affected by slippage of the needle segments with respect to the tissue-mimicking phantoms, was, on average, 63% ± 4% for forward motion and 55% ± 7% for steering motion. Moreover, the needle successfully steered with a mean deflection-to-insertion ratio of 0.41 ± 0.11 (i.e., radius-of-curvature of 44 mm). The proposed bioinspired needle design is a relevant step toward developing steerable needles for percutaneous interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.