Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849221›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025

Brain imaging screening in metastatic breast cancer: patients' and physicians' perspectives.

Leonor Matos, Mette van Ramshorst, Volkmar Müller, Elisa Agostinetto, Sabine Linn, Matteo Lambertini, Veronique Dieras, Fanny le Du, Sofia Braga, Carmen Criscitiello and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Leonor MatosBreast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mette van RamshorstNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Volkmar MüllerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Elisa AgostinettoUniversité libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Institut Jules Bordet, Service de Oncologie, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Sabine LinnNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Matteo LambertiniUniversity of Genova, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Veronique DierasDepartment of Medical Oncology at Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France.
Fanny le DuDepartment of Medical Oncology at Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France.
Sofia BragaInstitut José de Mello Saúde, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carmen CriscitielloEuropean Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Katarzyna J JerzakSunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Gil MorganSkåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Sara BruckerDepartment for Women's Health, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Patricia von KrogeUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Renate HaidingerBrustkrebs Deutschland e.V., Hohenbrunn, Germany.
Gema Rodríguez RecioAsociación Española Cancer de Mama Metastásico, Madrid, Spain.
Eva Schumacher-WulfMamma Mia! Magazine, Cologne, Germany.
Mario Fontes SousaCUF - Hospitais e Clínicas, Lisbon, Portugal; Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal.
Francesco SchettiniMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: schettini@clinic.cat.
Elena LaakmannUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. Electronic address: e.laakmann@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine brain imaging screening (BIS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) without neurological symptoms is currently not recommended, as no survival/quality-of-life improvements have been demonstrated. We aimed to examine physicians and patients' attitudes and perceptions toward BIS.

methodsInternational cross-sectional online survey for patients and physicians, distributed from May 2023 to February 2024. Patients with BC diagnosis were deemed eligible for patients' survey completion and BC-treating physicians were invited to fill the physicians' questionnaire.

resultsA total of 529 physicians from 50 countries (80 % European) responded, mostly medical oncologists (70 %) working in academic hospitals (53 %). Most physicians request BIS (65 %), mainly when extracranial progression occurs, especially for HER2+ and triple negative BC (TNBC). Among physicians never performing BIS (35 %), 91 % would in case of proved clinical benefit. A total of 545 patients from 14 European countries completed the questionnaire. Median age was 50 years, 86 % had metastatic BC, 51 % hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, 30 % HER2-positive (HER2+) and 19 % TNBC. BM were diagnosed in 11.5 % patients with metastatic BC. 85 % patients would like to undergo BIS, especially younger ones (p = 0.02) and with HR-disease (p = 0.03), despite the uncertain clinical benefit. Notably, 91 % of patients would like to receive information regarding BM, while only 13 % of physicians routinely address the issue.

conclusionsThese results underline the willingness of patients to know more about the prospects of BM development, in contrast to the lack of routine discussion of this topic by physicians. Further investigation is warranted to demonstrate the clinical utility of routine BIS.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsNeuroimagingPhysiciansAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBrain imagingBrain metastasisMetastatic breast cancerScreeningSurvey

Identifiers

PMID40849221
PMCPMC12683136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.