Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849054›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025

Perplexity and proximity: Large language model perplexity complements semantic distance metrics for the detection of incoherent speech.

Weizhe Xu, Serguei Pakhomov, Patrick Heagerty, Eric Horvitz, Ellen R Bradley, Josh Woolley, Andrew Campbell, Alex Cohen, Dror Ben-Zeev, Trevor Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weizhe XuBiomedical Informatics and Medical Education (BIME), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: xuweizhe@uw.edu.
Serguei PakhomovPharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Patrick HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eric HorvitzMicrosoft Research, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ellen R BradleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Josh WoolleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew CampbellDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Alex CohenDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Dror Ben-ZeevBehavioral Research in Technology (BRiTE) Center, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Trevor CohenBiomedical Informatics and Medical Education (BIME), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Behavioral Research in Technology (BRiTE) Center, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Developing Data-Driven Clinical Signatures for People Who Experience HallucinationsU01MH135901 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BEN-ZEEV, DROR, COHEN, TREVOR · 2024 to 2025
$5.1M
CSRD VA IK2 CX002606NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH135901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSemantic coherence in speech is characterized by a logical, connected flow of ideas. A lack of coherence in speech may reflect disorganized thinking, a core feature of psychosis in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Developing tools that could help with automated assessment of semantic coherence in language could facilitate early detection of SSDs and improved monitoring of symptoms, enabling more timely intervention. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities on numerous language-centric tasks and have shown promise for analyzing semantic coherence due to the natural fit between their innate measures of language perplexity and the surprising turns that incoherent narrative often takes. This study aims to develop a novel representation and associated measure of semantic coherence using LLM-based perplexity metrics and to compare this measure with traditional vector distance-based coherence metrics.

methodWe evaluated "bag" and "chain" models based on LLM perplexities as measures of semantic coherence. Regression models were trained using both single and paired combinations of perplexity- and proximity-based features to predict human ratings of semantic coherence using standardized instruments. Performance was evaluated on held-out examples from a training set of speeches from individuals experiencing psychotic symptoms and a test set of clinical interviews with patients diagnosed with SSDs, both with labels from human assessments of disorganized thinking severity.

resultsThe best performance was achieved using a combination of perplexity and proximity features, yielding a Spearman correlation with human ratings of 0.61 (vs. 0.56 with proximity features alone) on leave-one-out cross-validation in the training set, and 0.54 (vs. 0.52 with proximity features alone) on the test set.

conclusionWe developed novel methods for assessing semantic coherence using LLM perplexities and found them complementary to proximity-based methods. Combined, these methods showed improved performance across two datasets, highlighting LLM's potential in enhancing automated diagnosis and monitoring of SSDs.

Indexed as

LanguageSchizophreniaSemanticsSpeechFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleNatural Language ProcessingPsychotic Disorders

Identifiers

PMID40849054
PMCPMC13222020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.