Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40848291›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025

The Development and Validation of a Questionnaire That Assesses Female Athletes' and Coaches' Knowledge of the Menstrual Cycle.

Katharina Fischer, Elisabeth Maria Kirschbaum, Lucie Nikoleizig, Franziska Lautenbach, Kerry McGawley, Anne-Marie Elbe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07766577 (Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Menstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionnaire in Female Athletes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07766577 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Menstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionnaire in Female Athletes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBiruni UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsMenstrual Cycle, AthletesArmsMenstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionanire, Menstrual Symptom Scale, Health Literacy in Sports
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katharina FischerResearch Group Elite Female Athletes, Institute for Applied Training Science, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1219-2563
Elisabeth Maria KirschbaumResearch Group Elite Female Athletes, Institute for Applied Training Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Lucie NikoleizigSports Psychology, Faculty of Sports Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Franziska LautenbachSports Psychology, Institute of Sports Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kerry McGawleySwedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Anne-Marie ElbeSports Psychology, Faculty of Sports Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community Research Project FLS-1-22 at the Institute for AppOpen Access Publishing Fund of Leipzig UniversitySoSci Survey GmbH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a menstrual cycle knowledge questionnaire (MCKQ) for female athletes and coaches was developed and validated. Items for an initial questionnaire (Pre-MCKQ) were generated from existing questionnaires and supplemented by three experienced gynaecologists. The 21-item Pre-MCKQ was piloted on a sample of 325 recreational female athletes, 27 female coaches and 19 male coaches. Each item's difficulty and item-total correlation scores were assessed, and the final MCKQ was reduced to 12 items. Eighteen experts rated the 12-item MCKQ for relevance (M = 5.4 and SD = 0.8) and clarity (M = 5.4, SD = 1.0) using a 6-point Likert scale. The 12-item MCKQ was then completed by 562 elite female athletes and 170 coaches (55 female, 114 male and 1 other). Test-retest reliability was assessed with a separate cohort of sport science students (n = 64). The mean difficulty index was 57%, and the mean item-total correlation was r = 0.36. Cronbach's alpha of 0.73 indicates that the questionnaire is reliable and test-retest reliability was strong. Knowledge test scores differed significantly among female athletes, female coaches and male coaches (F (2,728) = 8.59, p < 0.01 and ηp

Indexed as

AthletesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMenstrual CycleAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultelite sportsinstrument developmentknowledge testmenstrual healthquestionnaire construction

Identifiers

PMID40848291
PMCPMC12374752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.