Observational studyClinical and translational science2025
Real-World Effectiveness of Rebamipide on Gastritis Symptoms: A Patient-Focused Approach.
Observational study in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-World Effectiveness of Rebamipide on Gastritis Symptoms: A Patient-Focused Approach.Clinical and translational science · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rebamipide is a gastric mucosal protectant used to relieve gastritis symptoms. Real-world evidence on the comparative effectiveness of rebamipide monotherapy versus combination therapy with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in routine clinical settings is limited. This study evaluated the effect of rebamipide in reducing subjective gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms among patients with gastritis symptoms using a patient-focused approach. This multicenter, observational study enrolled patients aged 19 years and older who were prescribed rebamipide for gastritis symptoms across 81 local clinics and hospitals. Patients received rebamipide twice daily for 2 weeks, with an optional 4-week extension. GI symptom severity and frequency were collected via patient-reported outcomes at baseline and posttreatment. Patients were categorized into a rebamipide monotherapy group and a combination therapy group, with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) applied to adjust for baseline confounding. Statistical analyses included ANCOVA for symptom score changes and chi-square tests for categorical symptom improvement. Of the 2209 patients included in the analysis, 1946 were in the monotherapy and 263 were in the combination therapy. Both treatment groups showed significant posttreatment reductions in GI symptom scores, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in severity, frequency, and total score before and after IPTW (p > 0.05). The symptom improvement rate (≥ 50% reduction) was 71.5% in the monotherapy group and 71.4% in the combination therapy group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.976). Rebamipide monotherapy provided similar levels of GI symptom relief compared to combination therapy with PPIs in a real-world clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.