Trial reportJournal of pediatric psychology2025
Evaluating the effect of sleep kits and training in foster care clinic visits.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis three-arm pragmatic control trial tested the effectiveness of a single-dose evidence-based psychological intervention (EBPI) with and without a sleep kit (treatment arms) to usual care (control arm) among young people (ages 2-20 years) new to a foster care placement.
methodsCaregivers and youth were screened for sleep concerns before their foster care clinic visit; if a concern was identified, enrolled young people and caregivers (N = 177) completed sleep assessments before the start of their clinic visit. On days when a psychologist was unavailable to address sleep concerns, participants were enrolled in the control arm. When a psychologist was present, clinic days were randomly assigned to condition (EBPI, EBPI + sleep kit). Participants and clinicians were masked to treatment arm during the clinician portion of their visit. Participants were unmasked at the end of their visit. At follow-up visits, surveys assessing sleep were re-administered. Chart reviews captured documented sleep concerns at clinic visits outside the foster care clinic in the 6 months following intervention.
resultsCompared to controls, those receiving EBPI reported less medicinal sleep aid use (e.g., melatonin) following intervention. Sleep concerns persisted in approximately half of enrolled youth and did not vary by study assignment; sleep outcomes were also similar.
conclusionsA single-dose EBPI to address sleep concerns may be effective for reducing use of medicinal sleep aids but is not effective for addressing sleep concerns more generally for young people in foster care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.