Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40848275›Full record

SynthesisUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026

Transvaginal ultrasound for detecting parametrial involvement in suspected deep pelvic endometriosis: updated meta-analysis.

J L Alcázar, C Montoya, C Candau, C Catalan, R Orozco, M Á Pascual, S Ajossa, S Guerriero

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J L AlcázarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Quironsalud, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9700-0853
C MontoyaDepartment Gynecology, Clínica El Rosario, Medellín, Colombia.
C CandauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
C CatalanDepartment of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
R OrozcoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Quironsalud, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7521-0676
M Á PascualDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5095-6981
S AjossaCentro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita (PMA) e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2688-0678
S GuerrieroCentro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita (PMA) e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1359-7155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo perform an updated meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) for detecting lateral parametrial involvement in women with suspected deep pelvic endometriosis.

methodsA literature search was performed in the Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2021 to May 2024 for studies evaluating TVS for detecting parametrial involvement in women with suspected deep pelvic endometriosis, using laparoscopy with or without histology as the reference standard. The information gathered was combined with data from our previous meta-analysis on this topic. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated overall and for subgroup analyses considering parametrial laterality. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to evaluate study quality.

resultsAfter exclusions, four new studies fulfilling the selection criteria were identified. Combined with the four studies included in our previous meta-analysis, eight studies including a total of 6728 women (13 456 parametria) were included. The mean prevalence of parametrial involvement was 21.3%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of TVS for detecting parametrial involvement were 63% (95% CI, 31-86%) and 98% (95% CI, 96-99%), respectively. When considering only the five studies that reported laterality, the corresponding values were 85% (95% CI, 64-95%) and 98% (95% CI, 92-99%) for the left parametrium and 84% (95% CI, 61-94%) and 97% (95% CI, 92-99%) for the right parametrium. Heterogeneity was high for the overall analysis and subgroup analyses.

conclusionsThe diagnostic performance of TVS for detecting parametrial involvement in women with suspected deep pelvic endometriosis is better than that reported previously. This may be attributable to the use of a standardized TVS scanning technique and improved knowledge of pelvic ultrasound anatomy. Accurate parametrial assessment could improve surgical planning and patient outcome. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

EndometriosisFemaleHumansPelvisSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyVaginaendometriosisparametriumtransvaginalultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40848275
PMCPMC12757821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.