Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40848224›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Updates on Therapy Options in Fit and Unfit Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML.

Gray H Magee, Michael R Grunwald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The best laid schemes...Haematologica · 2026
    Article
  3. CRISPRi Screen Identifies a Novel Growth Suppressor lncRNA,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gray H MageeAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, 1021 Morehead Medical Drive, LCI Building 2, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA. Gray.magee@advocatehealth.org.
Michael R GrunwaldDivision of Hematology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute and Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 1021 Morehead Medical Drive, LCI Building 2, Suite 60100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe integration of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and advanced cytogenetic diagnostics into routine clinical practice is reshaping frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in both fit and unfit patients. Molecular profiling now enables personalized treatment strategies, particularly for patients harboring mutations in FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, KMT2A, and NPM1. Small molecule inhibitors, first reserved for relapsed/refractory disease, are increasingly used in the upfront setting. However, universal NGS testing at diagnosis is critical to identify eligible patients for these targeted therapies. In patients lacking actionable mutations, treatment can still be refined using karyotypic abnormalities or high-risk features suggestive of antecedent MDS. In our practice, we continue to use 7 + 3 induction for fit patients, adding midostaurin or quizartinib for FLT3-mutated AML, or gemtuzumab ozogamicin for core binding factor (CBF) AML expressing CD33. For patients with therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, CPX-351 is our standard induction approach. For unfit patients, we generally offer hypomethylating agents with venetoclax. In the presence of IDH1 mutations, we consider azacitidine combined with ivosidenib. If venetoclax is contraindicated or not tolerated, targeted therapies such as gilteritinib, ivosidenib, or enasidenib may be appropriate based on mutation profile. However, we try to identify clinical trials for all our patients at diagnosis. One of the more exciting recent developments is the emergence of menin inhibitors for patients with KMT2A rearrangements or NPM1 mutations. While several agents have received FDA approval or breakthrough status in the relapsed/refractory setting, they are now being actively studied as frontline options with promising results. When feasible, clinical trial enrollment should be considered for newly diagnosed patients with these alterations. As the therapeutic landscape for AML continues to evolve, timely molecular characterization is more essential than ever to optimize outcomes and select the most appropriate frontline strategy.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorDisease ManagementHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationNucleophosminTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorNPM1 protein, humanNucleophosminAcute myeloid leukemiaFLT3 mutationFrontline therapyIDH mutationKMT2A rearrangementTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID40848224
PMCPMC12449387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.