ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2025
The association between changes in AUDIT-C scores and acute mental healthcare utilization over the next year in a primary care population.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnhealthy alcohol use (UAU) is common in primary care populations and can significantly impact mental health. Screening for UAU within primary care is increasingly used for point-in-time identification of UAU, but it is less clear whether changes in alcohol screening scores effectively capture changes in alcohol-related risk.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from adult primary care patients in a Northwest US health system who had completed two AUDIT-C screens 11-24 months apart (T1, T2). Scores were grouped into five categories from no use to very high-risk UAU. Generalized estimating equation models tested whether changes in AUDIT-C categories from T1 to T2 were associated with changes in risk for nonaddiction mental health acute care utilization (emergency department or hospital admission) over 1 year after T1 and T2.
resultsOf 165,101 patients (61% female; mean age 55), mental health acute care utilization risks were 0.9% after T1 and 0.8% after T2. Compared to those with stable drinking (T1 utilization 0.8%, T2 0.8%), mental health acute care utilization risk decreased for patients with a one-level decrease (T1 1.1%, T2 0.9%, p < 0.01) or greater than or equal to two-level decrease (T1 2.5%, T2 1.4%, p < 0.001). Increases in AUDIT-C categories were not associated with increased risk of mental health acute care utilization.
conclusionsChanges in AUDIT-C score categories over time, particularly decreases, may reflect real changes in an important risk of UAU. Changes in alcohol screening scores may offer clinicians, health systems, and researchers meaningful information about changes in health risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.