ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Recommendations for Increasing Sample Diversity in Autism Research: Lessons from Multisensory Studies.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2024, the United States House of Representatives passed ruling H.R.7213, the Autism CARES Act, which, if passed by the Senate, will reauthorize funding to extant national autism research programs, with an emphasis on including autistic individuals significantly affected by the disorder. This shift toward research inclusion across the autism spectrum clearly highlights the lack of representation in the past. In the field of multisensory integration, it is well documented that there are changes to how autistic individuals integrate stimuli across different sensory modalities, and the relationship between atypical (multi)sensory processing and the core features of autism is well documented. However, much of this research utilizes samples of autistic individuals with high cognitive, verbal, and functional ability. The purpose of this review is to draw attention to disparities in the samples used in multisensory research in autism. We conducted a systematic review of all studies examining multisensory function in autism to date and provide basic descriptive statistics of the studies. We observed that the vast majority of multisensory research is focused on young, low support needs autistic individuals, with very little investigation in autistic individuals with high support needs (HSN). Additionally, we found investigation into the effect of sex or comorbidities to be lacking. We propose methodological improvements addressing gaps in the research in order to make multisensory research in autism more inclusive to HSN autistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.