ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
The interpretable surgical temporal informer: explainable surgical time completion prediction.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePredicting surgical time completion helps streamline surgical workflow and OR utilization, enhancing hospital efficacy. When time prediction is based on interventional video of the surgical site, time predictions may correlate with technical proficiency of the surgeon because skill is a useful proxy of completion time. To understand features that are predictive of surgical time in surgical site video, we develop prototype-like visual explanations, making them applicable to video sequences.
methodsWe introduce an interpretable method for predicting surgical duration by identifying prototype-like patterns within egocentric video of the surgical site. Unlike conventional image-based prototype models that generate patch-based prototypes, our method extracts video-based explanations tied to segments of surgical videos with similar time deviation patterns. We achieve this by comparing the principal components of feature representation differences at various time points in the predictions. To effectively capture long-range dependencies in the prediction task, we employ an informer as the primary predictive model.
resultsThis model is applied to a dataset of 42 point-of-view craniotomy videos, collected under an approved IRB protocol. On average, our interpretable model performs better than the baseline models in surgical time completion.
conclusionOur approach not only contributes to the interpretability of surgical time predictions but also takes full advantage of the detailed information provided by surgical video data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.