ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Predictive efficacy of phantom-less calibration of computed tomography for cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCage subsidence is a common complication after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the predictive accuracy of conventional Hounsfield units (HU) for subsidence varies across studies. We aimed to develop a simple, phantom-less calibrated method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using preoperative cervical computed tomography (CT) and compared its predictive efficacy for cage subsidence with HU values.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed ACDF procedures performed by the corresponding author at our institution. Preoperative cervical spine CT scans were used to measure HU values at the surgical level. Additionally, HU values for calibration tissues-including cortical bone (CB), blood (B), skeletal muscle (SM), and adipose tissue (A)-were also measured. A linear regression equation was established from the HU measurements of these tissues and their standardized density values. The HU value at the surgical level was substituted into this equation to calculate volumetric BMD (vBMD). The area under the curve (AUC) was then calculated to compare the predictive efficacy of HU values and vBMD measurements for subsidence.
resultsEighty-one patients were included in the study. Both HU values and calibrated vBMD were found to be risk factors for cage subsidence. Compared to HU values (AUC 0.703), calibrated vBMD (AUC 0.738-0.802) showed a stronger correlation with subsidence and higher predictive efficacy. Among the vBMD measurements, the combination of skeletal muscle and adipose (SM + A) provided the highest predictive efficacy (AUC 0.802), with an optimal cut-off value of 197.5 mg/cm³.
conclusionBoth HU values and phantom-less calibrated vBMD are reliable predictors of cage subsidence after ACDF. The phantom-less calibrated vBMD can improve predictive efficacy for cage subsidence compared to HU values. We propose using SM + A calibrated vBMD to predict cage subsidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.