ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Deep learning-based lightweight model for automated lumbar foraminal stenosis classification: sagittal CT diagnostic performance compared to clinical subspecialists.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosing lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS). However, access remains limited in China due to uneven equipment distribution, high costs, and long waiting times. Therefore, this study developed a lightweight deep learning (DL) model using sagittal CT images to classify LFS severity as a potential clinical alternative where MRI is unavailable.
methodsA retrospective study included 868 sagittal CT images from 177 patients (2016-2025). Data were split at the patient level into training (n = 125), validation (n = 31), and test sets (n = 21), with annotations, based on the Lee grading system, provided by two spine surgeons. Two DL models were developed: DL1 (EfficientNet-B0) and DL2 (MobileNetV3-Large-100), both of which incorporated a Faster R-CNN with a ResNet-50-based region-of-interest (ROI) detector. Diagnostic performance was benchmarked against spine surgeons with different levels of clinical experience.
resultsDL1 achieved 82.35% diagnostic accuracy (matching the senior spine surgeon's 83.33%), with DL2 at 80.39% (mean 81.37%), both exceeding the junior spine surgeon's 62.75%. DL1 demonstrated near-perfect diagnostic agreement with the senior spine surgeon, as validated by Cohen's kappa analysis (κ = 0.815; 95% CI: 0.723-0.907), whereas DL2 showed substantial consistency (κ = 0.799; 95% CI: 0.703-0.895). Inter-model agreement yielded κ = 0.782 (95% CI: 0.682-0.882).
conclusionsThe DL models achieved a mean diagnostic accuracy of 81.37%, comparable to that of the senior spine surgeon (83.33%) in grading LFS severity on sagittal CT. However, given the limited sample size and absence of external validation, their applicability and generalisability to other populations and in multi-centre, large-scale datasets remain uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.