ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Barriers to Effective Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Qualitative Study on Patient Perspectives on Vaginal Estrogen.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisVaginal estrogen therapy is widely accepted as a safe and effective treatment for symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), yet it is likely underutilized owing to various factors relating to patient perceptions, barriers to access, and health care system outreach. The aim of our study is to explore patient beliefs and opinions regarding its use.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted with patients prescribed vaginal estrogen at an ambulatory urogynecology office between October 2022 and August 2023. Participants completed a symptom inventory followed by a 1:1 in-depth interview based on a structured guide designed to elicit candid insights and detailed responses into perceptions and experiences with vaginal estrogen. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methods in a three-phase coding process to identify key themes.
resultsTwenty-two participants were interviewed. Six major themes emerged: knowledge base, barriers to health care access, motivation for symptom relief, concerns regarding side effects, physician-patient relationship, and barriers to compliance. Although participants understood the connection between GSM and aging, they often felt unclear about which symptoms vaginal estrogen targeted, how to apply it, and how it differed from systemic hormone replacement therapy. Barriers such as cost, lack of insurance coverage, and concerns about cancer were frequently reported. Physician education helped to alleviate fears, improving patient confidence in using vaginal estrogen.
conclusionsThis study identified key beliefs and barriers affecting the use of vaginal estrogen for GSM. These findings highlight the need for improved patient education, better physician counseling, and enhanced communication to support adherence to this beneficial therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.