ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Utility of machine learning for predicting severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension based on CT metrics in a surgical cohort.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) models to explore the relationship between chronic pulmonary embolism (PE) burden and severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) in surgical chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). MATERIALS AND
methodsCTEPH patients with a preoperative CT pulmonary angiogram and pulmonary endarterectomy between 01/2017 and 06/2022 were included. A mean pulmonary artery pressure of > 50 mmHg was classified as severe. CTs were scored by a blinded radiologist who recorded chronic pulmonary embolism extent in detail, and measured the right ventricle (RV), left ventricle (LV), main pulmonary artery (PA) and ascending aorta (Ao) diameters. XGBoost models were developed to identify CTEPH feature importance and compared to a logistic regression model.
resultsThere were 184 patients included; 54.9% were female, and 21.7% had severe PH. The average age was 57 ± 15 years. PE burden alone was not helpful in identifying severe PH. The RV/LV ratio logistic regression model performed well (AUC 0.76) with a cutoff of 1.4. A baseline ML model (Model 1) including only the RV, LV, Pa and Ao measures and their ratios yielded an average AUC of 0.66 ± 0.10. The addition of demographics and statistics summarizing the CT findings raised the AUC to 0.75 ± 0.08 (F1 score 0.41).
conclusionsWhile measures of PE burden had little bearing on PH severity independently, the RV/LV ratio, extent of disease in various segments, total webs observed, and patient demographics improved performance of machine learning models in identifying severe PH. KEY POINTS: Question Can machine learning methods applied to CT-based cardiac measurements and detailed maps of chronic thromboembolism type and distribution predict pulmonary hypertension (PH) severity? Findings The right-to-left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio was predictive of PH severity with an optimal cutoff of 1.4, and detailed accounts of chronic thromboembolic burden improved model performance. Clinical relevance The identification of a CT-based RV/LV ratio cutoff of 1.4 gives radiologists, clinicians, and patients a point of reference for chronic thromboembolic PH severity. Detailed chronic thromboembolic burden data are useful but cannot be used alone to predict PH severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.