ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
The retrosigmoid keyhole approach to the cerebellopontine angle: a modified surgical technique and the evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a common postoperative complication after suboccipital craniotomies and can develop into a potentially life-threatening situation. Advances in dural replacement materials have revolutionized the treatment of CSF leaks and provide innovative alternatives to traditional repair methods. Synthetic and biological dural replacement materials, as well as fibrin sealants and tissue engineering approaches, offer improved durabilit, biocompatibility, and regenerative properties. However, to avoid complications associated with biomaterials and to minimize the use of dural substitutes whenever possible, careful surgical technique is essential for dural closure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the utility of a modified surgical technique for the retrosigmoid keyhole approach in reducing postoperative CSF leaks. A total of 168 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. All of them underwent surgery between 2015 and 2024 at our clinic for lesions in the cerebellopontine angle. A retrosigmoid keyhole approach was used in all cases. Two patients (1.2%) of the 168 developed a postoperative CSF leak: 1 (0.6%) incisional and 1 (0.6%) non-incisional. None of them developed CSF leak-related meningitis. The small retrosigmoid approach combined with the sandwich dural closure technique proved effective in reducing postoperative CSF leakage. While biomaterials contribute to improved dural sealing, careful surgical handling of posterior fossa structures remains essential for optimal outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40848078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.