ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
A comparison between venous blood sampling and capillary volumetric absorptive microsampling for antibiotics levels monitoring in individuals with and without periodontal disease.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Volumetric Microsampling for Patient-Centric Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Clinical Pharmacology: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to compare the antibiotic concentrations obtained using the volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices with those determined in plasma from conventional venous blood collected within the frame of a pharmacokinetic study of amoxicillin (AMO), metronidazole (MET), azithromycin (AZI), commonly used for periodontal treatment. The suitability and overall, acceptability of the VAMS approach was also ascertained by both participants of the pilot study and dentist practitioners. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwelve volunteers (6 subjects without periodontal problems (PH), and 6 individuals affected with periodontitis (PP)) were administered 500 mg each of amoxicillin, metronidazole, and azithromycin. Paired venous blood (VB) and capillary VAMS samples were collected at 2-, 6-,10-, 24-, 48- and 96-hours post-antibiotics administration. Antibiotic concentrations were determined using multiplex liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and t-tests.
resultsSignificant differences in antibiotic concentrations were observed between VAMS and venous blood (VB) collection methods, across different time points for the three antibiotics (p < 0.05). AMO concentrations in VB were 3.5-fold higher (p < 0.01) than in VAMS at early time points (2, 6, 10 h (h)). MET levels in VB were 1.5-fold higher than in VAMS at 2 h and 6 h, (p < 0.01), but this difference disappeared after 10 h. Alternately, while AZI levels were similar in VB and VAMs 2 h after administration, AZI concentrations in VB and VAMS declined non parallelly, with VB levels decreasing to about 60 to 25% of those measured in VAMS over the observed 96 h interval. Antibiotic exposures were not different in the PH and PP groups. Differences in antibiotics concentrations determined in VB and VAMS samples are a direct consequence of (i) the matrices used for analyses (plasma in VB, vs. whole blood with VAMS), (ii) the subjects' hematocrit, and (iii) the distinct cell distribution pattern of antibiotics with AMO characterized by a weak penetration in red blood cells (RBC) while AZI tends to progressively concentrate into RBC. MET was present at higher concentrations in plasma until 6 h which thereafter tended to re-equilibrate equally in plasma and RBC.
conclusionThough VAMS yielded significantly different results compared to plasma, it effectively reflects the concentration evolution of the antibiotics and could be an alternative in pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic monitoring. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: VAMS holds promise in advancing therapeutic drug monitoring in periodontal research and clinical practice. Being less invasive than venous puncture it is well accepted by subjects and facilitate blood monitoring in clinical trials and non-hospital settings. Its minimal invasiveness and simplified logistics make it suitable for enhancing precision medicine and pharmaceutical approaches in periodontology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.