ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Skin Quality: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality.
aimsTo evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. PATIENTS/
methodsA structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality.
resultsMFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient.
conclusionsMFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.