ReviewInternal medicine journal2025
Addressing the 'python' crisis affecting medical specialist training programmes: organisational frameworks and interdisciplinary insights.
Review in Internal medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical education programmes constantly need to balance numerous and often competing demands of their stakeholders (i.e. trainees, educators, hospital administration, specialist colleges and accrediting bodies). Many of these issues are difficult to resolve; such challenges actually represent a special type of crisis - known as a 'python' crisis in scholarly organisational management literature. Basic physician training programmes are particularly susceptible to 'python'-like crises. These specialist vocational training programmes rely on the goodwill of experienced clinicians, who provide teaching and supervision to trainees on a voluntary basis and whose engagement in teaching activities is often limited because of other work and personal commitments. On top of this, expectations from important internal and external stakeholders collectively act as additional constraints, similar to the constricting coils of a python. Many of these issues remain unresolved over years and are likely to grow over time. Utilising the 'python' metaphor as an analogy, this review integrates interdisciplinary insights from the fields of educational leadership, organisational crisis management, developmental psychology, strategic finance and the natural sciences to offer a framework ('SCALE') that simultaneously aims to improve a training programme's resilience to short-term shocks while fostering long-term sustainability. This proposed framework may prove useful not only for hospital-based training programmes in internal medicine but also education programmes at all levels of medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.