ArticleHealth promotion practice2025
A Multilevel Partnership Approach to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes and cost of patient navigation in increasing colorectal cancer screening in a safety net hospital-based health center.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The District of Columbia Department of Health (DC Health) has been a recipient of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program funding since 2015. We present details on the partnership model established by DC Health to increase screening uptake among populations with low levels of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We examined the DC Health partnership model using a mixed-methods case study approach. DC Health's CRC screening program uses a socioecological framework approach, focusing on the individual, interpersonal, organization, and community levels, to work with partners to increase CRC screening by implementing evidence-based interventions. We present details on the role of each partner, their socioecological model of influence, and key responsibilities. The DC Health partnership supported implementation of evidence-based interventions and CRC screening in nine health systems that serve patient populations with high CRC risk factors and historically low CRC screening trends. CRC screening uptake among health system partners increased from 19% in 2015 to 53% by 2022, surpassing the average screening rate in DC's Federally Qualified Health Centers (47%). The DC Health experience illustrates how multi-level partnerships can contribute to increasing CRC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.