Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847659›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2025

Electrophysiological Evidence for Impaired Central Pain Modulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Dilara Kersebaum, Josephine Lassen, Julia Forstenpointner, Manon Sendel, Sophie-Charlotte Fabig, Sonja Nölker, Juliane Sachau, Steffen Paschen, Daniela Berg, Ralf Baron and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dilara KersebaumDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-9722
Josephine LassenDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Julia ForstenpointnerDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Manon SendelDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Sophie-Charlotte FabigDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Sonja NölkerDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Juliane SachauDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Steffen PaschenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Daniela BergDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Ralf BaronDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Philipp HüllemannDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

Zambon GmbH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a remarkable overlap between structures involved in pain perception and the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent efforts to allocate pain into mechanistic subtypes require a better understanding of central pain processing in PD patients.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to show electrophysiological evidence for altered central pain processing in a patient group with PD, taking their reported pain, somatosensory profile, and motor symptoms as well as pharmacotherapy into account.

methodsThe laser-evoked-potential (LEP)-habituation paradigm and quantitative sensory testing were applied to PD patients (n = 41) in the off-l-dopamine (levodopa) state. The development of LEP amplitudes and laser pain ratings over the course of 100 painful stimuli was compared to those of an age-matched control group (n = 24). The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III and the painDETECT questionnaire and medical history, including pharmacotherapy, were assessed and analyzed in context with LEP and pain habituation aiming to find an electrophysiological proxy for central sensitization.

resultsPatients exhibited a significantly reduced capacity for LEP habituation regardless of clinically reported pain and sensory profile. No association of EEG data has been found with the mean l-DOPA equivalent dose taken by the patients.

conclusionsWe hereby report electrophysiological evidence for an impaired central pain modulation in PD patients regardless of pain presentation and individual sensation. Further exploration of abnormal central pain processing in PD using methods like the LEP habituation paradigm or conditioned pain modulation protocol is needed in larger cohorts. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Laser-Evoked PotentialsPainPain PerceptionParkinson DiseaseAgedElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansLevodopaMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementLevodopacentral pain modulationlaser‐evoked potential habituationpainpain mechanismsParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID40847659
PMCPMC12661641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.