ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2026
The Impact of Lunar Phases During Day and Night Cycles on Perinatal Outcomes: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLight changes during the lunar cycle affect rhythms in diverse species. Human studies focusing on whether the moon influences human health have so far neglected the effects of light/dark cycles. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether lunar phases impact perinatal outcomes by considering illumination levels due to day/night rhythms.
methodsTo assess the influence of moon phases, this nationwide cohort study identified cases with a singleton pregnancy that involved daytime (06:00 a.m. to 08:59 p.m.) and nighttime (09:00 p.m. to 05:59 a.m.) delivery at ≥ 23 + 0 gestational weeks with a birthweight of ≥ 500 g. Data on women who underwent elective cesarean or labor induction were excluded from the analyses. The lunar cycle was categorized as full moon, new moon, or other lunar phases. The standardized birth ratio (SBR) was chosen as the primary outcome parameter, while the duration of labor and adverse neonatal short-term health (pH of < 7.2 and/or a 5-min Apgar score of < 7) were chosen as the secondary outcome variables.
resultsWe identified a total case number of 462,947 births, of which 242,518 (52.4%) occurred during the day and 220,429 (47.6%) at night. Different moon phases did not appear to influence either the SBR or adverse neonatal outcomes. However, nighttime births may show a trend toward a prolonged maximum duration of labor related to moon phases (62 vs. 65 vs. 70 h for new/full/other moon phases, p = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Considering illumination levels, some moon phases may increase the risk for prolonged births during nighttime. However, assessing the effect of lunar phases on health variables is complex. Co-environmental agents should be incorporated into future analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.