ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Prognostic value of the co-stimulatory molecule OX40 expression in Extranodal Natural Killer/T-cell Lymphoma.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- OX40 (TNFRSF4) Tracks Immune Infiltration in Small Cell Lung Cancer and Shows a Cohort-Specific, Non-Replicated Association with the POU2F3/SCLC-P Subtype: A Multi-Source In Silico Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the clinicopathological features and the prognostic values of the co-stimulatory molecules OX40 and the inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS) in Extranodal Natural Killer/T-cell Lymphoma (ENKTL).
methods82 participants (median age 51 years, 26.8% female) were included in this study. OX40 and ICOS expression was detected using immunohistochemistry on paraffin‑embedded sections. The level of OX40 and ICOS expression was categorized into negative (0%, no staining) and positive groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of survival rates, and group comparisons were made using the Log-rank test.
resultsPositive staining for OX40 and ICOS was observed in 64 (78.0%) and 48 (58.5%) cases, respectively. The main differences between OX40-positive and OX40-negative were in the Chinese Southwest Oncology Group and Asia Lymphoma Study Group ENKTL (CA) stage, Korean Prognostic Index (KPI), CD68, PD1, PDL1, and CD152. Patients exhibiting positive OX40 expression demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in survival compared to the negative group (
conclusionsOur findings reveal that positive OX40 expression serves as an independent prognostic marker for improved survival of ENKTL, suggesting its potential utility in stratifying patient risk and optimizing treatment strategies. Future research should focus on the therapeutic targeting of OX40 in ENKTL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.