Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847607›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025

Evaluation of local anesthetic blockade in cats undergoing castration in a high-quality, high-volume spay/neuter setting: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Elizabeth A Berliner, Martha E Stone, Scarlett Boulting, Janet Scarlett

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A BerlinerCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-379X
Martha E StoneUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scarlett BoultingCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Janet ScarlettCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesThe objective of this prospective study was to compare the nociceptive blunting and analgesic efficacy of two different local anesthetic solutions (lidocaine and a mixture of lidocaine plus bupivacaine) and a placebo for cat castrations in a high-quality, high-volume spay/neuter (HQHVSN) clinic as an adjunct to standard HQHVSN anesthetic protocols.MethodsA total of 88 healthy, shelter-owned male cats presenting to an HQHVSN clinic in the northeastern USA between August 2019 and October 2020 were enrolled in this blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Cats were randomized to receive an intratesticular injection of saline placebo (SP group; n = 32), lidocaine 1 mg/kg (L group; n = 34) or a mixture of lidocaine 1 mg/kg and bupivacaine 1 mg/kg (LB group; n = 22) before routine castration. Other than the use of randomized local anesthetic blocks, all standard HQHVSN protocols for anesthesia and surgery were followed. Measured variables included perioperative heart rates, surgeon satisfaction with anesthetic depth, surgeon satisfaction with tissue quality, postoperative pain scores and the rate of incisional complications.ResultsTreatment groups did not differ in demographic characteristics or baseline heart rate. Percent increase in intraoperative heart rate was significantly larger in cats in the SP group than in the L (

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalOrchiectomyAnimalsBupivacaineCatsLidocaineMalePostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLidocaineanesthetic protocolcat castrationhigh-qualityhigh-volume spay/neuter (HQHVSN)Local anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40847607
PMCPMC12375170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.