ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Machine Learning in Rugby Union: Predicting and Identifying Key Performance Indicators for Professional Rugby Union Players in Match Play Based Workload.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Sub-Elite Youth Football Players: Predicting Recovery Through Machine Learning Integration of Physical, Technical, Tactical and Maturational Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Rugby Union: Predicting and Identifying Key Performance Indicators for Professional Rugby Union Players in Match Play Based Workload.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rugby union is an intermittent high-intensity contact sport requiring the analysis of various training and match metrics. Time-motion analysis and video analysis have enhanced the understanding of the interplay between these two factors. However, limited studies have investigated the effect of workload on key performance indicators (KPIs) during matches. In this study, data collected from the global positioning system (GPS) were used to calculate cumulative workload values over 7, 14, and 21 days prior to each game. After dimensionality reduction through principal component analysis (PCA), these workload values were employed as features, with game KPIs as target variables. Modeling was conducted using linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) for regression tasks. The superiority of the model was assessed by coefficient of determination (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.