ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Using Machine Learning to Risk Stratify Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain but No Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Large language models for acute coronary syndrome triage at first medical contact in emergency departments.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop a machine learning-based model to predict the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, for whom acute myocardial infarction was excluded after serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included adult patients presenting with chest pain at 5 study hospitals between 2021 and 2024 in Texas. Patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction during the index visit were excluded. The primary outcome was the occurrence of 30-day MACE, defined as myocardial infarction or all-cause mortality within 30 days of the index ED visit. A long short-term memory algorithm was used to develop the prediction model.
resultsThe analysis included 14 177 patients with a median age of 49.7 years, 41.2% of whom were men. A total of 535 patients (3.8%) had at least 1 high-sensitivity cardiac troponin level above the 99th percentile. Thirty-nine patients (0.3%) experienced 30-day MACE, including 15 (0.1%) with myocardial infarction and 24 (0.2%) with all-cause mortality. The long short-term memory model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting 30-day MACE (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.884 [95% CI, 0.815-0.941]), myocardial infarction (AUC, 0.963 [95% CI, 0.926-0.993]), and all-cause mortality (AUC, 0.849 [95% CI, 0.698-0.948]).
conclusionsThe long short-term memory model accurately predicted 30-day MACE in ED patients presenting with chest pain and no acute myocardial infarction, using patient demographics, vital signs at ED presentation, electrocardiographic findings, and serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels measured at flexible time points within 24 hours of ED arrival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.