Observational studyClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Results of the ACCOuNT Trial: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Pharmacogenomics Implementation Trial for African American Inpatients.
Observational study in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03225820 (Implementation of Point-of-Care Pharmacogenomic Decision Support Accounting for Minority Disparities), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of Point-of-Care Pharmacogenomic Decision Support Accounting for Minority Disparities
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics implementation efforts have increased over the last decade, but no published prospective pharmacogenomics trials have formally evaluated utility in underrepresented populations. We present final results from the ACCOuNT trial, a multi-institutional prospective study [NCT03225820] in which African American inpatients were genotyped and pharmacogenomic results made available via an integrated, scalable pharmacogenomics clinical decision support (PGx CDS) system to guide prescribing. We hypothesized that PGx CDS utilization would improve genomically concordant prescribing during inpatient admissions. We recruited 531 patients, of which 187 were readmitted (60.4% female, median age = 55 [range: 19-88], median readmissions/patient = 2 [range: 1-17]), resulting in 518 evaluable admissions during which the effect of available pharmacogenomic results was measured. In 50% of admissions, care teams utilized PGx CDS. 12% of inpatient prescriptions had pharmacogenomic annotations, with only 3.6% pharmacogenomically associated with increased caution ("discordant"); no PGx high-risk medications were prescribed. PGx CDS use by provider teams did not decrease genomically discordant prescribing (3.9% vs. 3.3% without PGx CDS use, P = 0.53). Nevertheless, inpatient care teams repeatedly consulted PGx CDS ostensibly to affirm genomically concordant prescriptions, as 48% of all admissions and 91% of discharges included pharmacogenomically annotated medications, mostly genomically concordant. Notably, timing of PGx CDS utilization correlated tightly with prescribing timing (correlation coefficient = 0.84, P < 0.05). In the first results of a multi-institutional, prospective pharmacogenomics trial focused on underrepresented patients, we found the relevance of currently actionable pharmacogenomics information for guiding inpatient prescribing to be modest; but observed frequent use of concordant pharmacogenomics to affirm prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.