Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847452›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Inductive and Transfer Learning-Based Hybrid Model Techniques for Accurate and Automated Diagnosis of Neurological Diseases.

Saroj Kumar Pandey, Yogesh Kumar Rathore, Sunakshi Mehra, Anurag Sinha, Tarun Raj Kumar, Ankit Kumar, Rekh Ram Janghel, Ayodele Lasisi, Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed, Md Sazid Reza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Saroj Kumar PandeyDepartment of Computer Engineering and Application, GLA University, Mathura, India.
Yogesh Kumar RathoreShri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-5611
Sunakshi MehraDepartment of Information Technology, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India.
Anurag SinhaICFAI Tech School, Computer Science Department, ICFAI University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1034-6334
Tarun Raj KumarCognitive Science, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India.
Ankit KumarDepartment of Information Technology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, India.
Rekh Ram JanghelDepartment of Information and Technology, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India.
Ayodele LasisiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Quadri Noorulhasan NaveedDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Md Sazid RezaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0671-9166

Funding

King Khalid University RGP2/496/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study presents NeuroDL, a novel deep learning-based diagnostic framework designed for the automated detection of brain tumors and Alzheimer's disease (AD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The objective is to enhance diagnostic precision and efficiency in neurology through advanced computer-aided decision support.

methodsNeuroDL utilizes convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on two publicly available, annotated MRI datasets. The proposed pipeline integrates optimized preprocessing, including normalization, skull stripping, and data augmentation, followed by CNN-based feature extraction and classification. Transfer learning and fine-tuning were employed to improve generalization on limited medical data.

resultsExperimental evaluations show that NeuroDL achieves 96.8% classification accuracy for brain tumor detection and 92.4% accuracy for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. The method also achieves an average F1-score of 0.965, precision of 0.969, and recall of 0.962 for brain tumors, and an F1-score of 0.918, precision of 0.921, and recall of 0.916 for AD. These results outperform state-of-the-art benchmarks on the same datasets.

conclusionPotential for real-time clinical deployment. It addresses key limitations of existing CAD systems by providing a unified, dual-disease diagnosis model with statistically validated performance gains. NeuroDL paves the way for reliable, scalable, and automated neurological disease diagnosis using deep learning.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrain NeoplasmsDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAIAlzheimersdeep learninginductive learningNeuroDLtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40847452
PMCPMC12373713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.