ArticleBMC psychology2025
Psychological crisis and emergency response in public health emergencies: a case study of the Mpox epidemic.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Emerging Global Threat After The COVID-19 Pandemic: Monkeypox Similarities and Differences.Polish journal of microbiology · 2026Review
- Risk assessment of earthquake online public opinion based on behavioral motivation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe frequent occurrence of social infectious diseases not only threatens the lives and health of the public but also brings about a more serious psychological crisis for the public. Understanding the public's psychological reactions during public health emergencies is crucial to developing an effective crisis management strategy.
methodsThis study focuses on the monkeypox epidemic and uses Python to crawl the topic data on monkeypox on Weibo. It uses social cognitive theory and sentiment analysis methods to analyze the public's sentiment values and psychological crisis reactions at different stages. It also comprehensively examines the relationship between different emotions during the epidemic.
resultsThe study found that the external environment is the basis for the public psychological crisis. Different subjects have different cognitions, determining the intensity of emotional reactions. In particular, the lack of social identity has aggravated the public's negative emotions towards infected people. Of course, different emotional responses are interrelated and have different intensities at various stages.
conclusionSocial norms and effective crisis management strategies are crucial to shaping the public's emotional response and alleviating psychological crises. Moreover, promoting the disclosure of real information and controlling the spread of rumors can effectively lessen the panic caused by the epidemic. By exploring the public's accurate psychological crisis response, this article provides suggestions and references for the government to actively intervene in the public psychological crisis during the epidemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.