ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
The importance of patient engagement when promoting age-inclusive research.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strategic recruitment and retention for pediatric research: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children and young people continue to face many barriers to actively participating in clinical research, despite the same research questions being just as applicable to them as their adult counterparts. Exclusion of paediatric populations from drug trials can result in a lack of timely, equitable access to disease modifying medications. In other circumstances, there is the risk of extrapolating evidence from adult populations that may not meet the needs of a young population. In this brief report, we highlight the importance of directly involving children and young people when evaluating inclusion in research studies. This is illustrated by our service evaluation investigating current paediatric haemodialysis practices and opinions, and how these relate to a UK based clinical trial called the 'NightLife study' that is being conducted in adult haemodialysis centres. We discuss how age-inclusive approaches are aiming to change the paediatric clinical research landscape going forward, using research initiatives built on the principles of equity and inclusivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.