ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Psychometric evaluation of novel hyperphagia questionnaires in a real-world setting for patients with a rare MC4R pathway disease.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are no validated measures to assess hyperphagia associated with rare MC4R pathway diseases, such as Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS). Symptoms of Hyperphagia© (SoH) and Impacts of Hyperphagia© (IoH) are novel questionnaires designed to assess signs and symptoms of hyperphagia and their impacts on patients and caregivers. We evaluated the psychometric performance of the caregiver-versions of the SoH: Caregiver (Observer-reported) and IoH: Caregiver (Observer-reported and Self-reported subscales).
resultsReliability and validity were evaluated using data from a multi-country cross-sectional survey of adult caregivers of patients with BBS experiencing hyperphagia and obesity. Other instruments included were Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL)-Kids (Parent Proxy), PROMIS Scale Global Health of Caregiver, Revised Impact on Family Scale (RIOFS), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. 242 eligible caregivers completed the survey. Exploratory factor analysis identified 1 factor per subscale. Strong internal consistency was observed for IoH: Caregiver (Observer) (Cronbach's a = 0.66) and IoH: Caregiver (Self) (a = 0.72) and moderate for SoH: Caregiver (Observer) (a = 0.40). Moderate-to-strong correlations were observed with school days missed and all domains of IWQOL-Kids except Physical Comfort (range = 0.315-0.573, p's < 0.001). Known-groups indicated significantly worse SoH: Caregiver subscores for patients using appetite suppressants or implementing more weight management approaches (6-10 vs. ≤5 or > 10). Caregivers reporting greater strain on RIOFS items and worse mental health had worse IoH subscores.
conclusionsThe SoH: Caregiver and IoH: Caregiver demonstrated preliminary validity, reliability, and consistency in a real-world setting. Research is underway to further validate these measures for use in clinical trials for BBS and other MC4R pathway-related diseases associated with obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.