Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847337›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Ageing well in the urban environment: meeting the health and social needs of older Adults - study protocol for a prospective, longitudinal mixed-methods study.

Marie Bolster, Abhijit Visaria, David Matchar, Denis Gerstorf, Tillman Schmitz, Benjamin Labohm, Raphael Kohl, Dagmar Haase, Paul Gellert, Angelique Chan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marie Bolster *Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. marie.bolster@charite.de.
Abhijit Visaria *Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
David MatcharProgramme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Denis GerstorfDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Tillman SchmitzGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Benjamin LabohmGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Raphael KohlInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Dagmar HaaseGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Paul GellertInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Angelique Chan *Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Wolfram J Herrmann *Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrbanisation and ageing populations are global challenges for ageing well. This mixed-methods study examines the health and social needs of older adults in urban areas in Berlin, Germany and in Singapore, focusing on three key dimensions of healthy ageing and wellbeing: health, mobility, loneliness, and equity as a cross-cutting theme.

methodsThe design follows a mixed-methods approach combining a quantitative longitudinal cohort study with qualitative interviews. For the quantitative cohort study, a standardised survey is carried out via home visits with a random sample of n = 1,050 adults aged 65 + years each in selected neighbourhoods in Berlin (three neighbourhoods) and Singapore (five neighbourhoods). The questionnaire comprises questions on health and health care utilization, neighbourhood, loneliness and social contacts, mobility and sociodemographic characteristics. Additionally, three functional tests (cognitive functioning, hand grip strength, and walking speed) are carried out with participants. Participants are followed-up after 12 months with a second survey interview. The survey data is linked with openly available geospatial data to allow for more in-depth study of the built-up and social environment and physical barriers in the selected neighbourhoods. For the qualitative component, walking interviews are conducted with n=50 people each in Berlin and Singapore focusing on older adults' subjective perspective on health, mobility, green spaces and loneliness in their urban neighbourhood. The results of the different study components will be triangulated. DISCUSSION: The Ageing Well Study offers a valuable opportunity to assess the health and social needs of older adults in two distinct urban contexts. The mixed-methods design and utilization of multiple data sources enables an examination of the various dimensions of ageing well from disparate angles and perspectives. The extensive quantitative data set permits the examination of associations and interlinkages between the various dimensions of ageing well and the living environment, as well as the identification of changes over a 12-month period. By opting for home visits, participants with limited mobility are more likely to participate. Minor adaptations of the instruments and methods were implemented to best suit local context, administrative regulations, and feasibility at the study site.

trial registrationThe study has been registered prospectively at the German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) (DRKS00033043, registration date: 16th Nov 2023) which is part of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP).

Indexed as

AgingHealthy AgingUrban PopulationAgedAged, 80 and overBerlinFemaleGermanyHumansLonelinessLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesAgeingCohort studyHealth careHealth geographySocial determinants of healthStudy protocolUrban health

Identifiers

PMID40847337
PMCPMC12372185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.