ArticlePlant methods2025
An intelligent method for detection of small target fungal wheat spores based on an improved YOLOv5 with microscopic images.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Agar-Water-Assisted ODJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- YOLO-RBSD: an efficient and accurate rice blast spore detector based on improved YOLOv8.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Feature enhancement and fusion-optimized defect detection model for Sanhua plums.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wheat is significantly impacted by fungal diseases, which result in severe economic losses. These diseases result from pathogenic spores invading wheat. Rapid and accurate detection of these spores is essential for post-harvest contamination risk assessment and early warning. Traditional detection methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, and difficult to detect small target spores in complex environments. Therefore, a YOLO-ASF-MobileViT detection algorithm is proposed to detect pathogenic wheat spores with varying sizes, shapes, and textures. Four types of common pathogenic wheat spores are used as the study object, including Fusarium graminearum, Aspergillus flavus, Tilletia foetida (sporidium maturum), and Tilletia foetida (sporidium immaturum). The Attentional Scale Sequence Fusion (ASF) is integrated into the original YOLOv5s to enhance the capture of small details in spore images and fuse multi-scale feature information of spores. Additionally, the Mobile Vision Transformer (MobileViT) attention mechanism is incorporated to enhance both local and global feature extraction for small spores. Experimental results show that the proposed YOLO-ASF-MobileViT model achieves an overall mAP@0.5 of 97.0%, outperforming advanced detectors such as TPH-YOLO (95.6%) and MG-YOLO (95.5%). Compared to the baseline YOLOv5s model, it improves the average detection accuracy by 1.6%, with a notable 4.3% increase in detecting small Aspergillus flavus spores (reaching 90.8%). The model maintains high robustness in challenging scenarios such as spore adhesion, occlusion, blur, and noise. This approach enables efficient and accurate detection of wheat fungal spores, supporting early contamination warning in post-harvest management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.