ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
The Impact of a Community Partner Research Training Program.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As part of its mission to address disparities in cancer outcomes and research participation, the Philadelphia Communities Conquering Cancer (PC3) coalition conducted a Community Partner Research Training program. The goal was to increase knowledge about cancer research and to prepare community members to partner on research activities. Eighteen out of 36 applicants were selected for a 5-week training program on research methods. Trainees completed baseline (N = 18) and follow-up surveys (N = 10) to measure knowledge acquisition. Demographic data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. For repeated cross-sectional group comparisons, Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used to test statistical differences between medians on baseline and follow-up surveys. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Trainees were mostly female (78%). Median age was 61.5 years. Forty-four percent were Black, 22% White, 17% Asian, and 17% other race. Twenty-eight percent were Hispanic. Forty-four percent were cancer survivors. We observed that perceived knowledge about research generally increased post-training from a median of 2 to 4 across a 5-point Likert scale (p < 0.001). This increase is shown for several items, including "how to conduct a research study" and "how to share findings with the community." Program ratings averaged 4 out of 5, indicating positive participant experiences in program organization and content. Involving diverse populations in cancer research is crucial for reducing health disparities. This training program demonstrated that it is feasible to increase knowledge about cancer research methodology among community partners. These results will be used to guide future research activities with PC3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.