Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing plane detection in point clouds through line sampling.

José María Martínez-Otzeta, Jon Azpiazu, Iñigo Mendialdua, Basilio Sierra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

José María Martínez-OtzetaDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Manuel Lardizabal 1, 20018, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. josemaria.martinezo@ehu.eus.
Jon AzpiazuDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Manuel Lardizabal 1, 20018, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Iñigo MendialduaDepartment of Languages and Information Systems, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Manuel Lardizabal 1, 20018, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Basilio SierraDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Manuel Lardizabal 1, 20018, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-122402OB-C21European Regional Development Fund PID2021-122402OB-C21Eusko Jaurlaritza IT1427-22Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2021-122402OB-C21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plane detection in point clouds is a common step in interpreting environments within robotics. Mobile robotic platforms must interact efficiently and safely with their surroundings, which requires capabilities such as detecting walls to avoid collisions and recognizing workbenches for object manipulation. Since these environmental elements typically appear as plane-shaped surfaces, a fast and accurate plane detector is an essential tool for robotics practitioners. RANSAC (Random Sample Consensus) is a widely used technique for plane detection that iteratively evaluates the fitness of planes by sampling three points at a time from a point cloud. In this work, we present an approach that, rather than seeking planes directly, focuses on finding lines by sampling only two points at a time. This leverages the observation that it is more likely to detect lines within the plane than to find the plane itself. To estimate planes from these lines, we perform an additional step that fits a plane for each pair of lines. Experiments conducted on three datasets, two of which are public, demonstrate that our approach outperforms the traditional RANSAC method, achieving better results while requiring fewer iterations. A public repository containing the developed code is also provided.

Indexed as

Plane detectionPoint cloud segmentationRandom sample consensusRobotics

Identifiers

PMID40847101
PMCPMC12373807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.