Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improved railway track faults detection using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficient and constant-Q transform features.

Rahman Shafique, Khadija Kanwal, Venkata Chunduri, Gyu Sang Choi, Imran Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rahman Shafique *Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea.
Khadija Kanwal *School of Computer Science, The Women University Multan, Multan, Ireland.
Venkata ChunduriDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Indiana State University, Indiana, USA.
Gyu Sang ChoiDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea. castchoi@ynu.ac.kr.
Imran AshrafDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea. imranashraf@ynu.ac.kr.

Funding

Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education NRF-2019R1A2C1006159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular inspection of the health of railway tracks is crucial to maintaining reliable and safe train operations. Some factors including cracks, rail discontinuity, ballast issues, burn wheels, super-elevation, loose nuts and bolts, and misalignment developed on the railways due to pre-emptive investigations, non-maintenance, and delay in detection pose grave threats and danger to the safe operation of railway transportation. In the past, manual inspection was performed for the rail track by a rail cart which is both prone to error and inefficient due to human biases and error. Several train accidents are reported in Pakistan; it is important to automate these techniques to avoid such train accidents for the safety of countless lives. This study aims to enhance railway track fault detection using an automatic rail track fault detection technique with acoustic analysis. Moreover, the proposed method contributes to making the dataset large by using the CTGAN technique. Results show that acoustic data may help to determine the railway track faults effectively and logistic regression is used to perform the classification for railway track faults with an accuracy of 100%.

Indexed as

Acoustic dataConstant-Q transform featuresFault detectionMachine learningMel-Frequency Cepstral CoefficientRailway track monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40847099
PMCPMC12373887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.