Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847085›Full record

SynthesisJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2025

Birth weight in relation to maternal and neonatal biomarker concentration of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid: a meta-analysis and meta-regression from a systematic review.

J M Wright, K M Rappazzo, H Ru, A L Lee, M W Dzierlenga, T F Bateson, E G Radke

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J M WrightUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical and Pollutant Assessment Division, Cincinnati, OH, USA. wright.michael@epa.gov.
K M RappazzoUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Public Health and Environmental Systems Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
H RuUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical and Pollutant Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
A L LeeUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical and Pollutant Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
M W DzierlengaUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical and Pollutant Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
T F BatesonUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical and Pollutant Assessment Division, Washington, DC, USA.
E G RadkeUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical and Pollutant Assessment Division, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) is a legacy chemical, that while banned in some countries, is still found in various environmental media and in nearly all humans given its long half-life.

objectiveWe examined mean birth weight (BW) differences in relation to PFOS exposure biomarkers using systematic review methods.

methodsWe fit a random effects model to obtain the overall pooled effect and for stratified analyses examining biomarker sample type and timing, study confidence, scaling factors, and country of study origin. We also conducted a meta-regression to assess the impact of gestational age and other factors on the overall pooled effect.

resultsWe found a 30-gram BW deficit (β = -30.3 g; 95%CI: -41.6, -18.9) with each ln-unit PFOS increase based on 53 studies identified in the systematic literature review. We detected BW deficits across all study confidence levels (β range: -27 to -37 g per ln-unit increase) with the largest deficit in the medium confidence grouping (β = -36.6 g; 95%CI: -56.3, -16.8). We did not see evidence of a gradient of BW deficits across biomarker sample timing (β range: -24 to -39 g per ln-unit increase), but the smallest deficit in our primary analyses was detected for the 18 early sample timing studies (β = -23.6 g; 95%CI: -38.7, -8.6). Robust deficits were also seen across various subgroups including by geographical region of study origin (e.g., Asian studies), more restrictive early biomarker sample collection, and post-partum samples (β range: -16.9 to -30.6 g). For meta-regression analyses, none of the investigated factors explained significant heterogeneity across studies. IMPACT: We detected a statistically significant BW deficit of 30 grams per each ln-unit PFOS increase across all 53 studies in our meta-analysis; results were comparable in magnitude across study confidence, sample timing, and other strata. Unlike previous meta-analyses based on fewer studies, our results suggest that pregnancy hemodynamics do not fully explain the overall association. Characterization of the potential risk of developmental effects related to PFOS and other legacy chemicals will have important risk assessment and risk management ramifications in the future.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsBirth WeightEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsMaternal ExposureBiomarkersFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyAlkanesulfonic AcidsBiomarkersEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsperfluorooctane sulfonic acidEpidemiologyMaternal and fetal exposure/healthMeta-analysisPerfluorinated chemicalsVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID40847085
PMCPMC12583133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.