ArticleScientific reports2025
Cross-language priming effects in bilingual novel metaphor processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This event-related potential study investigates whether semantically related words facilitate the processing of English novel metaphors and how this effect varies across within- and between-language contexts. Spanish-English/English-Spanish bilinguals performed a meaningfulness decision task in response to sentences in English, which included novel metaphors, novel similes, literal, and anomalous sentences. Prime words that were either related to the overall meaning of the target sentences or unrelated were presented either in English (the within-language condition) or Spanish (the between-language condition) before the sentence onset. In the N400 time window, unrelated primes evoked larger amplitudes than related primes in the within-language condition, indicating that conceptual compatibility reduces cognitive effort during early semantic processing. This effect was absent in the between-language condition, likely due to weaker associative links or additional cognitive demands from language switching. In the Late Positive Complex window, related primes imposed higher processing costs, reflecting their incorporation into sentence interpretation, while unrelated primes were dismissed earlier, reducing later-stage cognitive effort. These findings highlight the role of linguistic context in semantic processing, showing that within-language priming enhances efficiency, whereas between-language priming is less effective, particularly for complex novel metaphorical meanings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.