SynthesisInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Effectiveness of whole-body vibration training on body mass reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWhole-body vibration training (WBVT) is considered a time-saving, low-impact exercise modality that may aid in body mass management. However, the effectiveness of WBVT in changing body composition remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of WBVT on body mass, body mass index (BMI), and fat mass across different BMI and age categories.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of WBVT on weight-related outcomes. Studies published up to December 25, 2024 were screened according to PRISMA guidelines, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Meta-analyses were performed using mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under fixed or random-effects models.
resultsTwenty RCTs with 585 participants were included. WBVT alone had no significant effect on body mass (MD = 0.04), BMI (MD = -0.24), fat mass (MD = -0.90), fat-free mass (MD = 0.15), or body fat percentage (MD = 0.04%). Subgroup analysis by BMI showed no significant differences across weight categories. However, age-based subgroup analysis revealed that participants aged ≥50 years experienced a greater reduction in body fat percentage (MD = -1.79%) than those <50 years (MD = 0.46%; p = 0.008), suggesting a potential age-related effect. Overall risk of bias was rated as low to moderate.
conclusionWBVT alone did not significantly reduce body mass or fat mass, but it remains a promising intervention due to its neuromuscular and metabolic benefits. Future studies should explore optimized WBVT parameters, potential metabolic adaptations, and synergies with other interventions to enhance its applicability in body mass management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40847071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.