Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847056›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A multistrategy improved hunger games search algorithm.

Qiu Yihui, Zhang Xinqiang, Li Ruoyu, Li Dongyi, Xia Feihan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiu YihuiCollege of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Zhang XinqiangCollege of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361000, China. 13964821333@163.com.
Li RuoyuCollege of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Li DongyiCollege of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Xia FeihanCollege of Economics and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a multistrategy improved Hunger Games Search (MHGS) algorithm to address several inherent limitations of the original HGS, including imbalanced exploration and exploitation, insufficient population diversity, and premature convergence. The main contributions of MHGS are fourfold: (1) a phased position update framework that dynamically coordinates global exploration and local exploitation through three distinct search phases; (2) an enhanced reproduction operator inspired by biological reproductive patterns to preserve population diversity; (3) an adaptive boundary handling mechanism that redirects out-of-bounds individuals to promising regions, thus improving search efficiency; and (4) an elite dynamic oppositional learning strategy with self-adjusting coefficients to enhance the algorithm's ability to avoid local optima. These mechanisms work synergistically: the phased update balances global and local search, while the reproduction and boundary handling strategies jointly maintain solution diversity. The addition of oppositional learning further improves the robustness of the search process. Extensive evaluations on 23 benchmark functions, the CEC2017 test suite, and two engineering design problems demonstrate that MHGS achieves a 23.7% average improvement in accuracy compared to seven state-of-the-art algorithms (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05). Moreover, a binary variant, BMHGS_V3, using sigmoid transformation, attains an average classification accuracy of 92.3% on ten UCI datasets for feature selection tasks. The proposed MHGS algorithm provides a novel and effective framework for solving complex optimization problems, demonstrating significant theoretical and practical value in the field of computational intelligence.

Indexed as

Dynamic oppositional learningFeature selectionHunger games searchMetaheuristic algorithmPhased optimization

Identifiers

PMID40847056
PMCPMC12373881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.