Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847027›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Near viewing behaviors predict educational system in a machine learning model.

Ravid Doron, Einat Shneor, Lisa A Ostrin, Ariela Gordon-Shaag, Ayelet Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ravid DoronDepartment of Optometry, Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College, Jerusalem, 9101001, Israel. ravidro@jmc.ac.il.
Einat ShneorDepartment of Optometry, Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College, Jerusalem, 9101001, Israel.
Lisa A OstrinCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, 77004, TX, USA.
Ariela Gordon-ShaagDepartment of Optometry, Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College, Jerusalem, 9101001, Israel.
Ayelet GoldsteinDepartment of Computer Science, Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College, Jerusalem, 9101001, Israel.

Funding

United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation 2019053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive education systems are believed to contribute to high rates of myopia. This study examined whether near-viewing behaviors in college students differ based on their pre-college educational systems and whether these behaviors can be used to classify students' educational background using machine learning. Male students ages 18-33 years who attended either an intensive (ultra-Orthodox) or a standard school system (non-ultra-Orthodox) prior to college were recruited. Refractive error was measured and near-viewing behaviors were assessed using a wearable sensor during academic study periods. Compared to standard school students, intensive school students had significantly more myopic refraction (P < 0.03), spent more time viewing very near distances (P < 0.004) and less time viewing intermediate distances (P < 0.008) and had shorter near-viewing distances (P < 0.0001). Machine learning identified far-viewing episodes > 5 min and viewing distance during near-viewing as predictors of educational background.These findings suggest that educational environments are associated with distinct visual behavior patterns that may be linked to refractive development. The ability to use machine learning to predict educational systems based solely on near-viewing behaviors underscores its potential as a tool for investigating educational and behavioral factors and refractive outcomes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMyopiaAdolescentAdultHumansMaleRefractive ErrorsStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40847027
PMCPMC12373835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.