ArticleCommunications biology2025
Evidence for compositionality in fMRI visual representations via Brain Algebra.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026Review
- Compositional Complexity in Text and Images.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies have revealed how the brain encodes various visual categories and concepts. An open question is how combinations of multiple visual concepts are represented in terms of the component brain patterns: are brain responses to individual concepts composed according to algebraic rules? To explore this, we generated "conceptual perturbations" in neural space by averaging fMRI responses to images with a shared concept (e.g., "winter" or "summer"). After thresholding to ensure specificity, we applied these perturbations to the neural pattern associated with a base image, forming new brain patterns that incorporate the added concept. These modified brain patterns were then decoded into images using a pretrained fMRI-to-image decoding model. Qualitative and quantitative inspection of the resulting images provides insight into how the brain might combine visual concepts. For example, adding a "winter" perturbation to the brain pattern of a man on a skateboard yields a new pattern representing a man on a snowboard in a winter scene-even when the perturbation modifies only a small subset of voxels. Our findings reveal that compositional processes in neural representations may lead to predictable perceptual outcomes, as interpreted by our decoding model. This suggests that the brain's combinatory encoding of concepts may follow a systematic, algebraic-like process-what we term "brain algebra." Although our study is model-driven, it opens avenues for future empirical work into the mechanisms of compositionality in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.