Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847011›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025

The diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test for the detection of early-onset colorectal cancer: an age-stratified analysis in South West England.

Melissa Barlow, David Messenger, Ryan Preece, Amy Prowse, Gary Abel, Willie Hamilton, Samuel Wd Merriel, Adam Chambers, Sarah Er Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Positive Predictive Value of Symptoms for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melissa BarlowUniversity of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK. M.Barlow@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-1868
David MessengerDepartment of Coloproctology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9880-2073
Ryan PreeceColorectal Tumour Biology Group, School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1718-6142
Amy ProwseUniversity of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.
Gary AbelUniversity of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-5161
Willie HamiltonUniversity of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-1373
Samuel Wd MerrielCentre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-9087
Adam ChambersColorectal Tumour Biology Group, School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-0535
Sarah Er BaileyUniversity of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-4778

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR203308Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) GW4-CAT PhD Programme for Health Professionals
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rising rapidly, with diagnoses typically occurring at a more advanced stage than late-onset CRC. In the absence of screening for younger patients, diagnosis relies on symptomatic presentation. The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a diagnostic triage tool for patients presenting with clinical features of CRC in primary care, though its performance in individuals under 50 years is not well established.

methodsA cohort of 38,117 symptomatic patients aged 18-49 years in upper South West England underwent FIT in primary care between 01/01/2021 and 10/07/2023. A FIT result of ≥10 µg Hb/g faeces was considered positive. In the same region, 528 EOCRC diagnoses were recorded between 01/01/2021 and 10/10/2024.

resultsOf the 528 EOCRC patients, 105 (20%) underwent FIT in the year before diagnosis. The sensitivity of FIT was 92.4% (95% CI 85.5-96.7%), specificity was 88.5% (88.2-88.8%), positive predictive value (PPV) was 2.2% (1.8-2.6%), and negative predictive value was 100% (100-100%). PPVs decreased in younger age groups (18-29, 30-39, 40-49 years).

conclusionsFIT performs excellently for patients aged 40-49; however, it may not be used optimally in patients <40 years. A more targeted strategy is needed to guide investigation in younger patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFecesOccult BloodAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAge of OnsetEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40847011
PMCPMC12533231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.