Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40847003›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2025

Key questions for the future of amyloid research in dementia: a framework for integrating complex datasets.

Sally Hunter, Sebastian Walsh, Carol Brayne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sally HunterCambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Forvie Site, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. seh66@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8063-6556
Sebastian WalshCambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Forvie Site, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
Carol BrayneCambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Forvie Site, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.

Funding

Alzheimer's Society 554 (AS-PG-2019b-024)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease research is moving into a new era, yet significant questions remain about its underlying biological mechanisms. In this article, we consider how the field might refine the transfer of evidence between research cohorts focused on rare, genetically defined familial forms of dementia, clinical trial cohorts, highly selective of relatively younger people, with single neuropathologies and few co-morbidities, and the overall picture of the dementia syndrome in the whole population. We examine four key areas in which the evidence base must be improved: i) how 'disease' definitions apply across these three groups, ii) the precise molecular identification of the protein at the heart of current Alzheimer's research - amyloid beta protein, iii) the contributions of the full amyloid precursor protein proteolytic system and iv) how this complex proteolytic system relates to wider cellular systems. We describe how a cross-disciplinary approach based on the APP matrix framework, could allow a systematic investigation of new perspectives to inform translational research and precision medicine approaches. Addressing these gaps will give us the biological grounding needed to provide a sound underpinning to innovations in the field.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesDementiaAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloidAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorHumansPrecision MedicineAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein Precursor

Identifiers

PMID40847003
PMCPMC12436173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.