ReviewMolecular psychiatry2025
Key questions for the future of amyloid research in dementia: a framework for integrating complex datasets.
Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aberrant ɑSMA expression reveals broad mossy fiber reorganization integrating with tangle and plaque formation and mitoenergetic alteration in the human hippocampus.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Memory Test Performance of People with Subjective Cognitive Decline Recruited From Different Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2025Review
- The gut-brain axis in Alzheimer's disease: how gut microbiota modulate microglial function.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease research is moving into a new era, yet significant questions remain about its underlying biological mechanisms. In this article, we consider how the field might refine the transfer of evidence between research cohorts focused on rare, genetically defined familial forms of dementia, clinical trial cohorts, highly selective of relatively younger people, with single neuropathologies and few co-morbidities, and the overall picture of the dementia syndrome in the whole population. We examine four key areas in which the evidence base must be improved: i) how 'disease' definitions apply across these three groups, ii) the precise molecular identification of the protein at the heart of current Alzheimer's research - amyloid beta protein, iii) the contributions of the full amyloid precursor protein proteolytic system and iv) how this complex proteolytic system relates to wider cellular systems. We describe how a cross-disciplinary approach based on the APP matrix framework, could allow a systematic investigation of new perspectives to inform translational research and precision medicine approaches. Addressing these gaps will give us the biological grounding needed to provide a sound underpinning to innovations in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.