ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Development and validation of a keypoint region-based convolutional neural network to automate thoracic Cobb angle measurements using whole-spine standing radiographs.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects a significant portion of the adolescent population, leading to severe spinal deformities if untreated. Diagnosis, surgical planning, and assessment of outcomes are determined primarily by the Cobb angle on anteroposterior spinal radiographs. Screening for scoliosis enables early interventions and improved outcomes. However, screenings are often conducted through school entities where a trained radiologist may not be available to accurately interpret the imaging results.
methodsIn this study, we developed an artificial intelligence tool utilizing a keypoint region-based convolutional neural network (KR-CNN) for automated thoracic Cobb angle (TCA) measurement. The KR-CNN was trained on 609 whole-spine radiographs of AIS patients and validated using our institutional AIS registry, which included 83 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion with both preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior X-ray images.
resultsThe KR-CNN model demonstrated superior performance metrics, including a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.22, mean squared error (MSE) of 9.1, symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE) of 4.29, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.98, outperforming existing methods.
conclusionThis method will enable fast and accurate screening for AIS and assessment of postoperative outcomes and provides a development framework for further automation and validation of spinopelvic measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.