ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025
When smartphones take over: a mixed methods study of phubbing in child and adolescent psychiatry.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The developmental trajectories of phubbing in Chinese adolescents: a variable-centered and person-centered perspective.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe recent term phubbing is the amalgamation of the words phone and snubbing, and refers to those phone-related behaviors through which we ignore, dismiss, or otherwise eschew social interactions. Little is known about phubbing among child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs), a group often called upon to provide direction on how to guide children in their rapidly evolving cybernetic contexts.
methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study of trainees in CAP (n = 73; 68% women), recruited in the US (6 training programs; n = 35) and Türkiye (5 programs; n = 38). For the quantitative component, we administered two standardized tests: the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP), and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). For the qualitative component, we conducted site-specific focus groups. After transcription, translation, and anonymization of the digitally recorded sessions, we analyzed the data using thematic analysis informed by interpretative phenomenology.
resultsYounger participants scored higher on the GSP (r = -0.43, < 0.001), but ratings did not differ between countries (F = 0.65, df = 1, 70, p = 0.42). GSBP scores did not differ across age or country (p > 0.05). Through thematic analysis we arrived at a four-domain model: (1) Perceptions: regarding the role of smartphone use in modern society and their social implications); (2) Explanations: respondents' conceptualization of antecedents to phubbing behaviors; (3) Consequences: specific outcomes, such as normalization or split attention; and (4) Recommendations: strategies to address phubbing and problematic phone use.
conclusionsPhubbing is a ubiquitous behavior that can have social and emotional consequences. Through a more nuanced understanding of their own phubbing practices, CAPs can modify maladaptive behaviors of their own, have a more empathetic understanding of phubbing by youths under their care, and provide more realistic guidance regarding smartphone use to patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.