Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846957›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2025

Healthcare costs after sepsis: a systematic review.

Victoria Chechulina, Fatima Sheikh, Meghan Lóser, Marina Englesakis, Kali Barrett, Sepsis Canada

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trajectories of sepsis survivors in Australia: A scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Encouraging direct discharges home from Critical Care.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria ChechulinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 3rd floor, 1465 Richmond Street, N6G 2M1, London, ON, Canada. vchechul@uwo.ca.
Fatima SheikhDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Meghan LóserDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Marina EnglesakisLibrary and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kali BarrettInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sepsis Canada

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening syndrome associated with significant health resource utilization. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated high healthcare costs during hospitalization with sepsis, but post-discharge health costs have not been characterized. Understanding these costs allows health system decision-makers to identify targets for reducing preventable spending and strain on healthcare resources. This systematic review aims to describe the post-hospitalization healthcare costs among adults living in developed nations who survived an episode of sepsis.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews from the year 2000 to February 4, 2025. The search strategy was developed by combining concepts of sepsis, costs, study types, and developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review and data extraction. Conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies. Narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings.

resultsWe identified 23 observational studies that met the inclusion criteria. The methods used to calculate and report healthcare costs varied widely across studies, including the types of costs incurred (readmissions, physician visits, medication costs, and others) and the period over which costs were calculated. Across studies, the median total healthcare cost among sepsis survivors in year one after discharge was $28,719 (IQR $21,715) and the median total healthcare cost in year two after discharge was $22,460 (IQR $14,407). The median cost of a readmission for sepsis survivors was $20,320 (IQR $4,889). Six of seven studies that included a non-sepsis comparator group reported that sepsis survivors accrue higher healthcare costs post-discharge compared to individuals without sepsis.

conclusionsOur systematic review demonstrates that sepsis survivors incur high healthcare costs that can persist for years after discharge from initial hospitalization. These findings underscore the long-term health economic burden of sepsis, highlighting sepsis as an important target for policy and practice interventions that could improve health outcomes and reduce costs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023456850.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsSepsisHumansCostsHigh-cost usersSepsis

Identifiers

PMID40846957
PMCPMC12374435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.