Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846923›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

How delays in seeking medical care for cervical cancer patients are affected by their health-seeking behaviour: a qualitative study.

Jing Fang, Yuying Cheng, Yu Liu, Qing Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing Fang *Department of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Yuying Cheng *Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Nursing, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qing YangDepartment of Nursing, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. yangqingsc@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72304060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is a global health challenge for women, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates, along with long-term health consequences and economic burden. Early screening and timely treatment can effectively manage cervical cancer, making it crucial for patients to seek medical attention promptly. Positive health-seeking behaviors (HSB) involve the awareness of health issues, self-assessment of health status, and the proactive gathering of information and taking appropriate actions to maintain health. Positive HSB are key to reducing the risk of delayed healthcare access for cervical cancer patients. However, delays in seeking medical care remain prevalent globally.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the underlying factors contributing to delayed medical care in cervical cancer patients. The findings provide a basis for improving the timely access to care for these patients.

methodsThe study was conducted between July 2024 and October 2024 at a tertiary oncology hospital in China. Cervical cancer patients who experienced delays in seeking medical care were purposively sampled and interviewed. Health-seeking behaviours were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using a theory-driven thematic approach, guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM).

resultsSeventeen cervical cancer patients participated in the study. Four themes emerged: (1) perception and assessment of symptoms (lack of knowledge, benign attribution of symptoms, ignorance of symptoms); (2) perceived threat of the disease (feeling healthy, low susceptibility, no symptomatic threat); (3) perceived benefits and barriers to health-seeking behaviours (reduced disease threat, alleviated psychological and financial burden, low awareness of healthcare access, health insurance coverage, limited healthcare resources); and (4) cues to action (family support, symptom exacerbation). In general, patients with cervical cancer who lack knowledge about the disease and have a diminished perception of the threat of the disease may or may not choose to seek timely medical care after assessing the benefits of health-seeking behaviours and the barriers they face.

conclusionThis study identifies key barriers to health-seeking behaviours among cervical cancer patients, including limited awareness of early symptoms and underestimated perceptions of risk and severity. It suggests that future interventions should adopt a multifaceted approach targeting healthcare providers, patients, and their social support systems. This strategy should emphasize disease-related knowledge and timely health-seeking behaviours. Clinically, greater emphasis on culturally sensitive communication and patient education is needed to reduce stigma and fear associated with gynecological care. At the policy level, expanding access to affordable screening services and strengthening rural healthcare infrastructure could help reduce disparities and promote earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareTime-to-TreatmentUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedChinaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCervical cancerDelays in seeking medical careHealth-seeking behaviourQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40846923
PMCPMC12372386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.