ArticleClinical proteomics2025
Diurnal rhythm of the human plasma proteome.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Lipid Metabolism: Cells, Metabolites, and Rhythms.Circulation research · 2026Review
- Timed secreted proteomes reveal regulation of hepatokines by the liver circadian clock.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights into postoperative delirium using untargeted high-throughput proteomics in elderly patients - a case-control study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Effect of water intake on routine laboratory test parameters in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlasma is the most used clinical specimen, yet diurnal variation in plasma proteins remains largely unexplored. We aimed to identify diurnally-regulated proteins in healthy individuals and assess their potential diagnostic implications, and highlight how diurnal awareness can advance future biomarker research.
methodsTwenty-four healthy young individuals were studied under highly controlled conditions. Venous blood was drawn every three hours over a 24-h period, yielding 216 samples, of which 208 high-quality plasma samples were analyzed via high-throughput mass spectrometry. The missing data were filtered and imputed, and rhythmicity was assessed using Cosinor-based modeling with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Tissue and pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the DAVID functional annotation tool.
findingsOf 523 proteins that passed quality thresholds, 138 (~ 26%) exhibited significant diurnal oscillations. Tissue enrichment analysis revealed that most rhythmic proteins originated from the liver and platelets, with additional enrichment in a variety of tissue types. Pathway enrichment showed diurnal regulation of hemostasis, immune signaling, integrin-mediated processes, glucose metabolism, and protein synthesis. Notably, 36 clinically utilized biomarkers, including albumin, amylase, and cystatin C exhibited diurnal variation, suggesting that failing to account for temporal fluctuations may reduce diagnostic precision.
interpretationThese findings demonstrate that over one-quarter of the human plasma proteome is under diurnal control. Such oscillations might have direct clinical implications, as the time-of-day may alter biomarker accuracy. Incorporating diurnal timing into diagnostic and research protocols, through standardized sampling or time-sensitive reference intervals, could improve patient care and inform future biomarker discoveries. Further research in larger, more diverse populations is needed to generalize these results and streamline practices in a way that takes diurnal variation into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.