Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846897›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of solid particle geometry, size, and intensity, coupled with fluid velocity, on erosion dynamics in elbow conduits.

Omid Mahmoudi, Yousef Shiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omid MahmoudiFaculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, P.O. Box: 36199-95161, Shahrood, Iran.
Yousef ShiriFaculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, P.O. Box: 36199-95161, Shahrood, Iran. yousefshiri@shahroodut.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sand production poses a significant challenge because of erosion caused by solid particles in turbulent flows, particularly in elbows and fittings. This research explores the influence of solid particle geometry, size, intensity, elbow radius of curvature, and fluid velocity on erosion dynamics in elbows under vertical flow conditions via the CFD-DPM (discrete phase model) coupling method. The novelty of this study lies in its integrative approach, which involves simultaneously analyzing multiple interrelated parameters and validating predictions with detailed experimental data. This provides more realistic insights into erosion behavior and more practical guidelines for minimizing wear in industrial pipelines. The numerical results were verified through experimental investigation. The findings revealed that increasing the number of particles increased the erosion rate up to a certain point, after which erosion did not change. This can be attributed to surface saturation, particle shielding, and energy dissipation mechanisms. Larger particles cause more erosion, whereas smaller, rounded particles cause less erosion. Furthermore, high flow rates and lower elbow radii of curvature induce higher impact pressures, especially on outer elbow surfaces, intensifying erosion for larger particles. Therefore, this study identifies the combined effects of particle and flow parameters that critically influence elbow erosion, highlighting effective control strategies to prolong equipment life. Future work should focus on developing mitigation strategies and exploring alternative materials to reduce erosion under turbulent flow conditions.

Indexed as

CFD-DPM (discrete phase model) couplingElbowErosionMultiphase flowSolid particles

Identifiers

PMID40846897
PMCPMC12373728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.